The big idea¶
PN11 derive the critical density for gravitational collapse in supersonic turbulence from first principles, rather than from the turbulent-pressure / sonic-scale argument of Krumholz & McKee (2005). The physical picture: turbulence drives shocks; the post-shock gas is dense and, if a post-shock region’s Bonnor–Ebert mass falls below its actual mass, it collapses. The minimum density at which this happens is the critical density . The star-formation rate then follows from the mass fraction of the turbulent density PDF lying above .
In gravoturb PN11 is kept as a clearly-labelled classical alternative to the
BM19 transition density — not the default path.
Core equations¶
Shock jump → characteristic post-shock density. Balancing thermal and ram pressure for a shock of velocity (Eq. 3) gives the post-shock density (Eq. 4)
where is the rms sonic Mach number.
Critical density for collapse (hydrodynamic case, Eq. 8). Setting the Bonnor–Ebert mass equal to the mass of a post-shock region, , yields
where is the fraction of the cloud size set by the turbulence integral scale. PN11 adopt (their Section 2, after Wang & George 2002), giving the numerical critical density (Eq. 11)
In log-density this is the PN11 critical threshold
Virial parameter (Eqs. 1, 9). Equivalently
(Bertoldi & McKee 1992; Eq. 1) or
(Eq. 9, a uniform sphere of radius
, mean density , 3-D rms velocity ). gravoturb’s
virial_parameter helper uses the Eq. 1 form. is virial
equilibrium; the SFR decreases with increasing (more turbulent
support relative to gravity) and increases with .
MHD generalisation (Eq. 18). Including magnetic pressure ( the ratio of gas to magnetic pressure),
which reduces to the HD case as . gravoturb implements only the
HD form (Eq. 8/11); the MHD form is noted but not coded.
Use in progenax¶
experimental/gravoturb/theory/collapse_threshold.py—critical_overdensity(Eq. 8),critical_log_density(classical-alternative threshold),THETA_PN11 = 0.35.
Validation: prefactor at ; .
Notes¶
Prefactor provenance. The correct prefactor is 0.547 (PN11 Eq. 11). A prior implementation used 0.242 (~2.3× too small) — corrected in the clean-room rewrite.
PN11’s is distinct from the Krumholz–McKee (2005) turbulent- pressure form and from the Federrath–Klessen (2012) form; BM19 also recast their own in terms of an critical density (BM19 Eq. 11/15), so the forms are related but not identical.
- Padoan, P., & Nordlund, \AAke. (2011). The Star Formation Rate of Supersonic Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence. The Astrophysical Journal, 730, 40. 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/40